Illustrative image
Has your Amazon Seller Account been suspended? We work on reinstatement without upfront fees.
No-Upfront-Fee Case ReviewBe careful with agencies that ask for payment before properly reviewing your case and promise instant reinstatement. If they were truly confident in their work, they wouldn’t ask you to pay anything upfront.
Who we are
Northline’s case-review team brings together founder Michele Corvo and two independent specialist consultants. All three are former Amazon employees.
At Amazon, he worked on major projects related to Seller account suspensions, particularly during the “Great Crackdown of 2019,” a major turning point when Amazon significantly changed its internal systems for evaluating Seller performance and behavior, with a direct impact on the intensity of controls and the number of suspensions.
The two independent consultants support cases when their relevant specialist experience matches the issue. Case staffing depends on the facts and scope, so not every specialist works on every engagement.
Northline is independent from Amazon. Former Amazon employment is professional background only and does not imply affiliation, endorsement, privileged access, or influence over Amazon’s decisions.
Request a Case Review
Section 3, funds held, verification and seller account suspension are not the same case.
Before another appeal goes out, we separate the restriction type. An Amazon seller account suspension, a Section 3 deactivation, withheld funds, a verification review, or an ASIN issue each needs different evidence and sequencing.
Amazon Section 3 deactivation
We read the Section 3 notice and look for the real trigger: account ownership, policy risk, marketplace integrity, documents, catalogue history, or operating behaviour.
Funds withheld or disbursement hold
When Amazon holds payouts, reserves, or disbursements, the practical question is what account risk is keeping the funds locked.
Verification and documents
If the restriction comes from KYC, ownership, address, invoices, or business documents, a generic reinstatement appeal can make the file harder to read.
Seller account suspended or deactivated
We separate a suspended, blocked, or deactivated Amazon seller account from ASIN, performance, product, funds, and verification problems before choosing the next move.
The most expensive mistakes happen before the appeal itself.
When the business is under pressure, the instinct is to move fast. That is usually the moment the case gets weaker.
They respond too quickly
Something gets sent just to avoid standing still, before anyone has understood whether the real issue is documentary, operational, behavioural, or verification-related.
They respond to the wrong notice
Many sellers confuse an account suspension with a verification request, withheld funds, or ASIN-level issues. From that point, the response is already aimed at the wrong target.
They reuse a template that does not belong to the case
The wording may sound persuasive, but if it does not hold up against the timeline, the evidence, and the actual documents, it only adds noise to the file.
They chase people selling certainty
When someone promises unrealistic percentages or guaranteed reinstatement, they are usually selling speed and confidence theatre, not a disciplined reading of risk.
We do not sell a standard appeal. We intervene in three moves.
Every serious case follows a simple sequence, but that sequence is rarely respected when the seller is under pressure.
We read the actual notice
We separate what Amazon has explicitly said from what you are assuming. If the notice changes, the response has to change with it.
We identify where the case breaks down
We look for the weak point: documents, ownership, supply chain, narrative consistency, submission history, or the wrong priority.
We define the next move
If the case should move forward, we build the next step properly. If another rushed submission would weaken the file, we say that immediately.
Boutique team. Account-risk reading. No theatre.
This page does not promise control over Amazon. It promises something more useful when the account is down: clarity, judgement, and a plan that does not add more noise to the file.
We are not a template machine
Every case is read against its real timeline, the documents available, and the actual business damage at stake.
We work on risk, not performance
The goal is not to sound convincing. The goal is to avoid saying the wrong thing in front of a review process that does not forgive inconsistency.
We also tell you when to stop
If another submission would be weak right now, we will say so. Forcing the next step just to get paid is the fastest way to burn time and margin.
Every blocked day hurts. Another wrong submission can cost even more.
We start from the latest notice and the attempts already made. We help you understand whether there is real room for a solid reinstatement path and what the next sensible step actually is.
Fill in the form. If the case is worth taking on, we will step in. If it is not ready yet, we will tell you exactly where it breaks down.